Instinct, on X

An Exceptional Product That Is Also, Apparently, Doomed

Andrew Wilkinson called Instinct the best proactive assistant he has used and predicted its investors lose everything. The replies argued for hours. Meanwhile it rebooked a United flight, found a forgotten $245 credit, and baffled a woman in Belgium.

What people were saying

The day belonged to @awilkinson, who managed the rare trick of writing a rave and an obituary in the same post: exceptional product, most proactive agent he has used, also doomed, also its investors will lose all their money. The argument was the familiar one (feature, not product; OpenAI or Anthropic ships an iMessage agent and it is over; why use an assistant that lacks the memory graph you already built elsewhere). Roughly a hundred people showed up to disagree in roughly a hundred directions.

Running underneath that, a quieter and more interesting conversation from @illscience about what happens when agents are the customers: supply-constrained markets like hot restaurant tables, whether the first multiplayer pattern is agent-to-agent or agent-inside-human-chat, and how you market to something that does not have preferences so much as sponsors. @sytaylor noted that Visa, Mastercard and Ant are now drafting a "Know Your Agent" spec, which is the kind of boring infrastructure news that tends to matter later.

The pushback

@BradGroux read the terms so you would not have to, and did not like them: a privacy policy the agent itself claimed did not exist, disconnecting an integration not undoing what was already copied, opt-out training, and language letting the agent enter binding agreements with the consequences landing on you.

Separately, Meta's Muse had a very good day at Instinct's expense. @pejmanjohn named it his main agent, @SavarSareen wrote a seven-point love letter to it, @jakemintz argued a real app beats bolting onto iMessage, and @startupoppa said the lack of a native app is a ceiling. @coleywoleyyy held the other line: Instinct's model feels better than anything Muse or Grok Bot is running (his replies then speculated about Chinese models and secret humans). @hristo_vassilev asked why any of this is new when Codex exists. @0xidanlevin read the new authenticator-code support as a deliberate security-for-UX trade that only a startup is allowed to make, and possibly a moat.

Notable anecdotes

@reva_jariwala got rebooked on a nonstop with the change fee waived, versus her previous experience of United hold music. @mvanhorn was told, unprompted, about a $245 settlement credit card he never activated. @LeosReal booked plane tickets, a DMV test, and gift cards in a week. @scottfelsenthal drove five hours while it negotiated his TV bill down over live chat. @srcasm reported his agent trading founder referrals with another investor's agent, which is either the future or a new genre of spam.

Best story of the day goes to @vvkgopalan, whose agent contacted a small Belgian BnB for a cab, prompting the front desk to call his French friend about someone named Instinct claiming to be his assistant. Cab booked. Everyone else confused.

Interest over time

Aug 15SepOctOct 7
Qualified posts per day · 1717 since Aug 15

Updated at 4:01pm ET from 43 posts. Posts published later appear on the Posts tab.